Volume 63 - Spring 1996	Download

Perservering misconceptions by Olive M. Kimball, EdD, MT(ASCP) Executive Director

From time to time we read and hear of persistent misconceptions about accreditation in general or NAACLS accreditation or approval in particular. We will try to address these either on our World Wide Web site or in the NAACLS News. Your comments and questions are invited.

Misconception 1
Programs that were accredited under the Committee on Allied Health Education and Accreditation (CAHEA) are still accredited by CAHEA.

Reality:
Since the dissolution of CAHEA all CAHEA/NAACLS accredited programs are simply NAACLS accredited programs. It is inappropriate to publish in any document an implied continuing relationship to CAHEA. CAHEA no longer exists and, even if the original certificate of your most recent accreditation says CAHEA, effective July 1, 1993, all such programs were accredited only by NAACLS. Each program received a certificate verifying accreditation by NAACLS.

NAACLS is recognized as an independent accrediting agency by the United States Department of Education (USDE), as CAHEA was and as CAAHEP now is. The USDE requires that programs accredited by NAACLS publish this fact along with an address and phone number of the agency. It is suggested that a statement similar to the following be placed in program publications:

This program is accredited by the
National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences
8410 W. Bryn Mawr Avenue, #670
Chicago, Illinois 60631-3415
Phone: 312. 714. 8880

Misconception 2
NAACLS accredits a program for a specific number of students.

Reality:
While it was once the case that a program was reviewed and then accredited for a maximum number of students, this is no longer true. A program is reviewed relative to available resources, the assumption being that a program will enroll only the number of students who can successfully graduate given existing resources.

While both the AMA Allied Health Directory and the NAACLS Inventories do, in fact, list class capacity, that figure is the average number of students who enroll in a given class. Class capacity is determined by the institution and may change often on the basis of institutional circumstances. Class capacity is not equivalent to being granted accreditation for a maximum number of students. NAACLS no longer grants accreditation for a specific number of students.

Top of the News
			Affiliate site visits may be conducted via videotape by Olive M. Kimball, EdD, MT(ASCP) Executive Director
			Bits 'n' pieces
			Fee changes: the ups and downs by Olive M. Kimball, EdD, MT(ASCP) Executive Director
			Guidelines for conducting a program closure by George J. Payan Program Coordinator, Program Services
			NAACLS introduces its World Wide Web site by Daniel Angelucci Administrative Liaison
			Role playing as a method for teaching and evaluating the affective domain by Benna Boutty, MA, MT(ASCP) Vice Chariman, PARC
			Tracking and reporting enrichment sites no longer required by George J. Payan Program Coordinator, Program Services
Features
			Act now! Attend a NAACLS workshop!
			Announcing upcoming scheduled site visits
			Dear Dr. NAACLS How to prepare to be a good site visitor
			Executive Director's corner by Olive M. Kimball, EdD, MT(ASCP) Executive Director
			Perservering misconceptions by Olive M. Kimball, EdD, MT(ASCP) Executive Director
			President's report by Cynthia Wells, EdD, CLS(NCA), MT(ASCP) President, Board of Directors
			Schedule of upcoming NAACLS meetings

	Select an Issue   Vol 109 - Fall 2011 Vol 108 - Summer 2011 Vol 107 - Spring 2011 Vol 106 - Volume 106 - Fall NAACLS News Vol 105 - Summer 2010 Vol 104 - Spring 2010 NAACLS News Vol 103 - Fall 2009 NAACLS News Vol 102 - Summer 2009 Vol 101 - Spring 2009 Vol 100 - Winter 2008 Vol 99 - Summer 2008 Vol 98 - Spring 2008 Vol 97 - Winter 2007 Vol 96 - Summer 2007 Vol 95 - Spring 2007 Vol 94 - Winter 2006 Vol 93 - Spring/Summer 2006 Vol 92 - Special Edition Vol 91 - Winter 2005 Vol 90 - Fall 2005 Vol 89 - Spring/Summer 2005 Vol 87 - Fall 2004 Vol 86 - Spring/Summer 2004 Vol 85 - Fall 2003 Vol 84 - Spring/Summer 2003 Vol 83 - Winter 2003 Vol 82 - Fall 2002 Vol 81 - Spring / Summer 2002 Vol 80 - Winter 2002 Vol 79 - Fall 2001 Vol 78 - Spring / Summer 2001 Vol 77 - Winter 2001 Vol 76 - Fall 2000 Vol 75 - Spring / Summer 2000 Vol 74 - Winter 2000 Vol 73 - Fall 1999 Vol 72 - Spring / Summer 1999 Vol 71 - Winter 1999 Vol 70 - Fall 1998 Vol 69 - Spring / Summer 1998 Vol 68 - Winter 1998 Vol 67 - Fall 1997 Vol 66 - Spring 1997 Vol 65 - Winter 1996 Vol 64 - Summer 1996 Vol 63 - Spring 1996 Vol 62 - Winter 1996 Vol 61 - Summer 1995 Vol 60 - Spring 1995 Vol 59 - Fall 1994 Vol 58 - Summer 1994 Vol 57 - Spring 1994 Vol 56 - Fall 1993 Vol 55 - Summer 1993 Vol 54 - Spring 1993 Vol 53 - Fall 1992 Vol 52 - Summer 1992 Vol 51 - Spring 1992 Vol 50 - Fall 1991 Vol 49 - Summer 1991 Vol 48 - Spring 1991 Vol 47 - Fall 1990 Vol 46 - Summer 1990 Vol 45 - Spring 1990 Vol 44 - Fall 1989 Vol 43 - Summer 1989 Vol 42 - Winter 1989 Vol 41 - Fall 1988 Vol 40 - April 1988 Vol 39 - December 1987 Vol 38 - September 1987 Vol 37 - Spring 1987 Vol 36 - Winter 1987 Vol 35 - October 1986 Vol 34 - November 1985 Vol 33 - November 1984 Vol 32 - July 1984 Vol 31 - November 1983 Vol 30 - November 1982 Vol 29 - November 1981 Vol 28 - December 1980 Vol 27 - August 1980 Vol 26 - September 1979 Vol 25 - August 1979 Vol 24 - June 1979 Vol 23 - February 1979 Vol 22 - October 1978 Vol 21 - July 1978 Vol 20 - April 1978 Vol 19 - October 1977 Vol 18 - July 1977 Vol 17 - April 1977 Vol 16 - February 1977 Vol 15 - November 1976 Vol 14 - September 1976 Vol 13 - June 1976 Vol 12 - December 1975 Vol 11 - October 1975 Vol 10 - August 1975 Vol 9 - July 1975 Vol 8 - June 1975 Vol 7 - April 1975 Vol 6 - February 1975 Vol 5 - December 1974 Vol 4 - November 1974 Vol 3 - September 1974 Vol 2 - August 1974 Vol 1 - June 1974