Volume 66 - Spring 1997	Download

Dear Dr. NAACLS Complying with 1995 Essentials

This letter was received in Dr. NAACLS' mailbox. . .

Dear Dr. NAACLS,

I received my seven-year award from the Board of Directors in the mail. My review was based on the 1986 Essentials. Does this mean I do not have to comply with the new requirements of the 1995 Essentials until my next review in 2004?

Signed,

Curious Program Director

Dear Curious Program Director,
First off, congratulations on your seven year award! NAACLS reserves this award for programs that have shown quality and stability over a long period of time. You should be proud that your program continues to maintain such high standards.

The 1995 Essentials were officially implemented on March 1, 1996. However, because of the nature of NAACLS notification of renewal cycles, many programs were already involved in the self-study process. In fairness to these programs, NAACLS offered them a choice of review under the 1986 Essentials or the 1995 Essentials. Your program fell into this category and you chose to be evaluated under the 1986 Essentials. This does not mean your program is not responsible for meeting the requirements of the 1995 Essentials.

The following requirement is listed under the Maintaining Accreditation section (Section VII) of the Essentials for all NAACLS program levels:

Programs are required to comply with administrative requirements for maintaining accreditation, including, in accordance with federal and state requirements, verifying compliance with these Essentials upon request from NAACLS.

NAACLS is recognized by the US Department of Education, and as such is responsible for monitoring programs between cycles as well as evaluating them during scheduled reviews. If credible evidence exists that your program is in violation of the 1995 Essentials, NAACLS may request documentation that your program is in compliance. At that time, regardless of which Essentials version was used during your last review, your program will be evaluated using the 1995 Essentials.

The bottom line is that ALL accredited and approved programs must be in compliance with the current Essentials or Standards at ALL times. The current version of the Essentials is the 1995 version, and as such, programs are responsible for maintaining full compliance with the new requirements as of March 1, 1996.

If you have any questions about your program, please call the appropriate program coordinator at the NAACLS office, (773) 714-8880, or email us at NAACLSINFO@naacls. org.

Sincerely,

Dr. NAACLS

Top of the News
			Act now! Attend a NAACLS workshop!
			An explanation of Essential 7 for CLT/MLT programs by K. Nisi Zell, EdS, MT(ASCP)SH Vice Chairman, CLSPRC
			New faces at NAACLS
			Pathologists' assistant programs awarded NAACLS accreditation by Jerry Phipps and Steve Suvalsky
			University administrators applaud NAACLS accreditation by Kay Doyle, PhD, MT(ASCP)
			Update on the approval process for clinical assistant programs by Cynthia Wells, EdD, CLS(NCA), MT(ASCP) President, Board of Directors
			WANTED: CLS-MT/CLT-MLT pathologist (CLSPRC)
			What's new?
Features
			Dear Dr. NAACLS Complying with 1995 Essentials
			Executive Director's corner by Olive M. Kimball, EdD, MT(ASCP) Executive Director
			Persevering misconceptions by Olive M. Kimball, EdD, MT(ASCP) Executive Director
			President's report by Cynthia Wells, EdD, CLS(NCA), MT(ASCP) President, Board of Directors
			Summer/Fall site visit schedule

	Select an Issue   Vol 109 - Fall 2011 Vol 108 - Summer 2011 Vol 107 - Spring 2011 Vol 106 - Volume 106 - Fall NAACLS News Vol 105 - Summer 2010 Vol 104 - Spring 2010 NAACLS News Vol 103 - Fall 2009 NAACLS News Vol 102 - Summer 2009 Vol 101 - Spring 2009 Vol 100 - Winter 2008 Vol 99 - Summer 2008 Vol 98 - Spring 2008 Vol 97 - Winter 2007 Vol 96 - Summer 2007 Vol 95 - Spring 2007 Vol 94 - Winter 2006 Vol 93 - Spring/Summer 2006 Vol 92 - Special Edition Vol 91 - Winter 2005 Vol 90 - Fall 2005 Vol 89 - Spring/Summer 2005 Vol 87 - Fall 2004 Vol 86 - Spring/Summer 2004 Vol 85 - Fall 2003 Vol 84 - Spring/Summer 2003 Vol 83 - Winter 2003 Vol 82 - Fall 2002 Vol 81 - Spring / Summer 2002 Vol 80 - Winter 2002 Vol 79 - Fall 2001 Vol 78 - Spring / Summer 2001 Vol 77 - Winter 2001 Vol 76 - Fall 2000 Vol 75 - Spring / Summer 2000 Vol 74 - Winter 2000 Vol 73 - Fall 1999 Vol 72 - Spring / Summer 1999 Vol 71 - Winter 1999 Vol 70 - Fall 1998 Vol 69 - Spring / Summer 1998 Vol 68 - Winter 1998 Vol 67 - Fall 1997 Vol 66 - Spring 1997 Vol 65 - Winter 1996 Vol 64 - Summer 1996 Vol 63 - Spring 1996 Vol 62 - Winter 1996 Vol 61 - Summer 1995 Vol 60 - Spring 1995 Vol 59 - Fall 1994 Vol 58 - Summer 1994 Vol 57 - Spring 1994 Vol 56 - Fall 1993 Vol 55 - Summer 1993 Vol 54 - Spring 1993 Vol 53 - Fall 1992 Vol 52 - Summer 1992 Vol 51 - Spring 1992 Vol 50 - Fall 1991 Vol 49 - Summer 1991 Vol 48 - Spring 1991 Vol 47 - Fall 1990 Vol 46 - Summer 1990 Vol 45 - Spring 1990 Vol 44 - Fall 1989 Vol 43 - Summer 1989 Vol 42 - Winter 1989 Vol 41 - Fall 1988 Vol 40 - April 1988 Vol 39 - December 1987 Vol 38 - September 1987 Vol 37 - Spring 1987 Vol 36 - Winter 1987 Vol 35 - October 1986 Vol 34 - November 1985 Vol 33 - November 1984 Vol 32 - July 1984 Vol 31 - November 1983 Vol 30 - November 1982 Vol 29 - November 1981 Vol 28 - December 1980 Vol 27 - August 1980 Vol 26 - September 1979 Vol 25 - August 1979 Vol 24 - June 1979 Vol 23 - February 1979 Vol 22 - October 1978 Vol 21 - July 1978 Vol 20 - April 1978 Vol 19 - October 1977 Vol 18 - July 1977 Vol 17 - April 1977 Vol 16 - February 1977 Vol 15 - November 1976 Vol 14 - September 1976 Vol 13 - June 1976 Vol 12 - December 1975 Vol 11 - October 1975 Vol 10 - August 1975 Vol 9 - July 1975 Vol 8 - June 1975 Vol 7 - April 1975 Vol 6 - February 1975 Vol 5 - December 1974 Vol 4 - November 1974 Vol 3 - September 1974 Vol 2 - August 1974 Vol 1 - June 1974