Volume 71 - Winter 1999	Download

Dear Dr. NAACLS Systematic program review

Dear Dr. NAACLS

The Essentials require that we have a continuing system for reviewing the program and use results of program evaluation in modifying the curriculum. Can you expand upon what this means and how can we be sure that we are doing what we need to do?

Signed,

Overburdened Program Director

Dear Overburdened:

Program evaluation is a critical component of an accredited program. Continuous evaluation means that it occurs throughout the accredited period, whether the period is seven years or only two. The continuous process must be directly related to the institutional mission and goals. There must be a clear understanding of what results are desired, and a sense of what the priorities for program improvement may be.

To meet the intent of the Essentials, program directors must manage an evaluation process that:

• Identifies outcome measures (results of the educational process)
  
• Collects relevant data (both qualitative and quantitative)
  
• Assesses the data in relationship to measurable goals
  
• Identifies plans to improve program quality
  
• Acts on changes for improvement
  

Program directors must use outcome measures for analyzing data and identifying actions and plans to improve the program. The pass rate of program graduates on certification exams is important, but it is only one measure of program effectiveness. Programs must have outcome measures for all graduates, even if they do not take certification exams. Other measures include success rates on comprehensive exams, graduation rates, placement rates, etc.

Program directors are directly responsible for conducting planning to improve the program's quality but should enlist the help of faculty and administrators in the process. If goals and plans are not accomplished, the program director should identify how these may be achieved in the future or why it is necessary to modify the goals and plans. When goals are met, the program director should identify future plans that will move the program and the profession forward.

Sincerely,

Dr. NAACLS

Top of the News
			A Bold New Look: the NAACLS accreditation/approval documents by Jennifer Zielinski, Gwen James Oriaikhi, and Monica Mitchell
			A call for volunteers by Megan Hennessy Eggert Meetings and Publicity Coordinator
			Designing professional curriculum using three taxonomic levels by Jane Adrian, EdM, MT(ASCP) NAACLS Site Visitor and Former CLSPRC Member
			Program Revitalization: a professional priority by Megan Hennessy Eggert Meetings and Publicity Coordinator
			Progress Reports for Initial Programs encouraging effective program evaluation by Monica Mitchell, MA Administrative Liaison
			Public Hearing announcement on CLS/MT Essentials
Features
			Dear Dr. NAACLS Systematic program review
			Executive Director’s corner The Higher Education Amendments of 1998: Impact on Accreditation and Distance Learning
			President’s report by Joeline D. Davidson, MBA, CLS(NCA), MT(ASCP) President, Board of Directors

	Select an Issue   Vol 109 - Fall 2011 Vol 108 - Summer 2011 Vol 107 - Spring 2011 Vol 106 - Volume 106 - Fall NAACLS News Vol 105 - Summer 2010 Vol 104 - Spring 2010 NAACLS News Vol 103 - Fall 2009 NAACLS News Vol 102 - Summer 2009 Vol 101 - Spring 2009 Vol 100 - Winter 2008 Vol 99 - Summer 2008 Vol 98 - Spring 2008 Vol 97 - Winter 2007 Vol 96 - Summer 2007 Vol 95 - Spring 2007 Vol 94 - Winter 2006 Vol 93 - Spring/Summer 2006 Vol 92 - Special Edition Vol 91 - Winter 2005 Vol 90 - Fall 2005 Vol 89 - Spring/Summer 2005 Vol 87 - Fall 2004 Vol 86 - Spring/Summer 2004 Vol 85 - Fall 2003 Vol 84 - Spring/Summer 2003 Vol 83 - Winter 2003 Vol 82 - Fall 2002 Vol 81 - Spring / Summer 2002 Vol 80 - Winter 2002 Vol 79 - Fall 2001 Vol 78 - Spring / Summer 2001 Vol 77 - Winter 2001 Vol 76 - Fall 2000 Vol 75 - Spring / Summer 2000 Vol 74 - Winter 2000 Vol 73 - Fall 1999 Vol 72 - Spring / Summer 1999 Vol 71 - Winter 1999 Vol 70 - Fall 1998 Vol 69 - Spring / Summer 1998 Vol 68 - Winter 1998 Vol 67 - Fall 1997 Vol 66 - Spring 1997 Vol 65 - Winter 1996 Vol 64 - Summer 1996 Vol 63 - Spring 1996 Vol 62 - Winter 1996 Vol 61 - Summer 1995 Vol 60 - Spring 1995 Vol 59 - Fall 1994 Vol 58 - Summer 1994 Vol 57 - Spring 1994 Vol 56 - Fall 1993 Vol 55 - Summer 1993 Vol 54 - Spring 1993 Vol 53 - Fall 1992 Vol 52 - Summer 1992 Vol 51 - Spring 1992 Vol 50 - Fall 1991 Vol 49 - Summer 1991 Vol 48 - Spring 1991 Vol 47 - Fall 1990 Vol 46 - Summer 1990 Vol 45 - Spring 1990 Vol 44 - Fall 1989 Vol 43 - Summer 1989 Vol 42 - Winter 1989 Vol 41 - Fall 1988 Vol 40 - April 1988 Vol 39 - December 1987 Vol 38 - September 1987 Vol 37 - Spring 1987 Vol 36 - Winter 1987 Vol 35 - October 1986 Vol 34 - November 1985 Vol 33 - November 1984 Vol 32 - July 1984 Vol 31 - November 1983 Vol 30 - November 1982 Vol 29 - November 1981 Vol 28 - December 1980 Vol 27 - August 1980 Vol 26 - September 1979 Vol 25 - August 1979 Vol 24 - June 1979 Vol 23 - February 1979 Vol 22 - October 1978 Vol 21 - July 1978 Vol 20 - April 1978 Vol 19 - October 1977 Vol 18 - July 1977 Vol 17 - April 1977 Vol 16 - February 1977 Vol 15 - November 1976 Vol 14 - September 1976 Vol 13 - June 1976 Vol 12 - December 1975 Vol 11 - October 1975 Vol 10 - August 1975 Vol 9 - July 1975 Vol 8 - June 1975 Vol 7 - April 1975 Vol 6 - February 1975 Vol 5 - December 1974 Vol 4 - November 1974 Vol 3 - September 1974 Vol 2 - August 1974 Vol 1 - June 1974