Volume 79 - Fall 2001	Download

Dear Dr. NAACLS Accreditation and approval costs

I have heard that the accreditation process is significantly more expensive than the approval process. I assume it is because of all the affiliate visits that must be made and travel costs are increasing. Still, can you explain it for me?

Signed,

Uncertain Program Director

Dear Uncertain:

The accreditation process and approval process are very similar in that they both rely on a review of self-study documents produced by programs. However, unlike approval, accreditation also requires a site visit, and there is a cost for site visitor travel expenses.

In accreditation, continuing programs are assigned two site visitors to visit the sponsoring institution. Nearby affiliates are also visited by the site visitors, if at all possible. When affiliates are more than an hour distant, they are visited by professionals in the area of the affiliate. NAACLS staff make every effort to find appropriate, knowledgeable individuals who are nearby.

There is also a difference in cost for the annual fee. The 2001-2002 annual accreditation fee is $1000 while the fee for approval is $900.

Site visit costs vary depending upon travel costs for visitors. The NAACLS staff do their best to keep costs down and, many times, the institutions are able to assist by identifying hotels that have special rates for visitors to the institution, offering on-site transportation, and negotiating meal arrangements. The site visit costs to programs last year ranged from approximately $150 to $2400 with an average somewhere around $1100. Visits to distant affiliates ranged from $0 to $50 with an average of about $25. Affiliate visitors often ask for no reimbursement.

The following charts may help to clarify costs for both accreditation and approval.

Since an actual accreditation review would occur, at most, once every five years, the cost of a site visit and the Site Visit Prep Fee can be averaged out over that time period. The Application Fee is for initial applicants only. Using the average cost of a site visit of $1100, the cost difference between accreditation and approval, on an average annual basis is $420.

Since the majority of programs under review at the last CLSPRC meeting received awards of seven years, their next site visit cost can be averaged over seven years. The average annual difference in cost between accredited and approved programs when accredited programs receive seven years is $329.

Please don't hesitate to contact the office if you have additional questions.

Sincerely,

Dr. NAACLS

Top of the News
			Attend a NAACLS Workshop
			Davidson Completes Second Term as President of NAACLS by Kathy V. Waller, PhD, CLS(NCA) President, NAACLS Board of Directors
			Examining the Costs and Benefits of Clinical Education by Barbara Jones, MHS, MT(ASCP) Member, Programs Approval Review Committee (PARC)
			Guest Column by Anthony S. Kurec, MS, DLM(ASCP) President, Clinical Laboratory Management Association
			Incorporating Management Skills Into the CLS/MT Curriculum by Vicki S. Freeman, PhD, MT(ASCP)SC Program Director, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
			Revised Standards Now Available
Features
			CEO's Corner Essentials Become Standards by Olive M. Kimball, EdD Chief Executive Officer
			Congratulations to New NAACLS Programs
			Dear Dr. NAACLS Accreditation and approval costs
			NAACLS Welcomes New Board and Committee Members by Megan Hennessy Eggert Meetings and Publicity Coordinator
			Past President's Report What's Past Is Prologue by Joeline D. Davidson, MBA, CLS(NCA) Past President, Board of Directors
			President's Report by Kathy V. Waller, PhD, CLS(NCA) President, NAACLS Board of Directors

	Select an Issue   Vol 109 - Fall 2011 Vol 108 - Summer 2011 Vol 107 - Spring 2011 Vol 106 - Volume 106 - Fall NAACLS News Vol 105 - Summer 2010 Vol 104 - Spring 2010 NAACLS News Vol 103 - Fall 2009 NAACLS News Vol 102 - Summer 2009 Vol 101 - Spring 2009 Vol 100 - Winter 2008 Vol 99 - Summer 2008 Vol 98 - Spring 2008 Vol 97 - Winter 2007 Vol 96 - Summer 2007 Vol 95 - Spring 2007 Vol 94 - Winter 2006 Vol 93 - Spring/Summer 2006 Vol 92 - Special Edition Vol 91 - Winter 2005 Vol 90 - Fall 2005 Vol 89 - Spring/Summer 2005 Vol 87 - Fall 2004 Vol 86 - Spring/Summer 2004 Vol 85 - Fall 2003 Vol 84 - Spring/Summer 2003 Vol 83 - Winter 2003 Vol 82 - Fall 2002 Vol 81 - Spring / Summer 2002 Vol 80 - Winter 2002 Vol 79 - Fall 2001 Vol 78 - Spring / Summer 2001 Vol 77 - Winter 2001 Vol 76 - Fall 2000 Vol 75 - Spring / Summer 2000 Vol 74 - Winter 2000 Vol 73 - Fall 1999 Vol 72 - Spring / Summer 1999 Vol 71 - Winter 1999 Vol 70 - Fall 1998 Vol 69 - Spring / Summer 1998 Vol 68 - Winter 1998 Vol 67 - Fall 1997 Vol 66 - Spring 1997 Vol 65 - Winter 1996 Vol 64 - Summer 1996 Vol 63 - Spring 1996 Vol 62 - Winter 1996 Vol 61 - Summer 1995 Vol 60 - Spring 1995 Vol 59 - Fall 1994 Vol 58 - Summer 1994 Vol 57 - Spring 1994 Vol 56 - Fall 1993 Vol 55 - Summer 1993 Vol 54 - Spring 1993 Vol 53 - Fall 1992 Vol 52 - Summer 1992 Vol 51 - Spring 1992 Vol 50 - Fall 1991 Vol 49 - Summer 1991 Vol 48 - Spring 1991 Vol 47 - Fall 1990 Vol 46 - Summer 1990 Vol 45 - Spring 1990 Vol 44 - Fall 1989 Vol 43 - Summer 1989 Vol 42 - Winter 1989 Vol 41 - Fall 1988 Vol 40 - April 1988 Vol 39 - December 1987 Vol 38 - September 1987 Vol 37 - Spring 1987 Vol 36 - Winter 1987 Vol 35 - October 1986 Vol 34 - November 1985 Vol 33 - November 1984 Vol 32 - July 1984 Vol 31 - November 1983 Vol 30 - November 1982 Vol 29 - November 1981 Vol 28 - December 1980 Vol 27 - August 1980 Vol 26 - September 1979 Vol 25 - August 1979 Vol 24 - June 1979 Vol 23 - February 1979 Vol 22 - October 1978 Vol 21 - July 1978 Vol 20 - April 1978 Vol 19 - October 1977 Vol 18 - July 1977 Vol 17 - April 1977 Vol 16 - February 1977 Vol 15 - November 1976 Vol 14 - September 1976 Vol 13 - June 1976 Vol 12 - December 1975 Vol 11 - October 1975 Vol 10 - August 1975 Vol 9 - July 1975 Vol 8 - June 1975 Vol 7 - April 1975 Vol 6 - February 1975 Vol 5 - December 1974 Vol 4 - November 1974 Vol 3 - September 1974 Vol 2 - August 1974 Vol 1 - June 1974