






|
CEO's Corner
by Olive M. Kimball, PhD, EdD NAACLS Chief Executive Officer
|
As announced in September 2001, the NAACLS Board of Directors authorized a
Task Force to study possible changes to entry level for the CLS/MT. Since then
there has been much discussion about the issues, and the Task Force has worked
diligently to research them. Because there has also been considerable
misunderstanding of both the intent and the process, I'd like to share some
background about the Task Force and bring you up to date.
At a pre-Board planning meeting in September 2001, the NAACLS Board reviewed the
NAACLS strategic plan for possible revisions. The Board does such an informal
review on an annual basis. Discussions lead to speculations of the future of the
professional programs accredited by NAACLS. Based upon these discussions, and
upon the outcomes of the NAACLS Futures Conference the year before, it was
decided that the Board should study possible changes of entry level, especially
for the CLS/MT. At the meeting the next day the Board charged a Task Force with
looking into the various issues related to possible changes for CLS/MT. A chair
was appointed to lead the initiative.
NAACLS has the responsibility for determining educational standards for the
professional programs it represents, and it is charged to look far into the
future to do that. It must seriously consider possible changes in the skills
needed by the workforce and facilitate effective utilization of laboratory
services. This 'futures' orientation requires NAACLS to take a proactive stance.
Further, there are major changes occurring in healthcare as well as in the
laboratory. Numerous national studies have appeared that call for reordering the
healthcare workforce and for developing bold and innovative changes to provide
services in the future. For example, the American Hospital Association report,
In Our Hands; How Hospital Leaders Can Build a Thriving Workforce, as well as
the Institute of Medicine report, Health Professions Education; A Bridge to
Quality, and the report from the National Academy Press, Crossing the Quality
Chasm; A New Health System for the 21st Century. For these reasons it is timely
to initiate such a study. The Task Force has been appointed to aid NAACLS with
its responsibilities.
The Task Force met several times during that first year, and presentations were
made to interested organizations about the questions that were to be studied.
Because it was understood that this was a controversial professional issue, it
was always made as clear as possible that this was a feasibility study and no
changes related to entry level could possibly be made without lengthy discussion
and broad input.
In September 2002 the Task Force submitted a report to the Board indicating its
progress. It identified specific questions that it was addressing and how it was
researching them. The Board agreed by consensus to continue its support of the
Task Force's efforts.
During the following year the Task Force generated written documents which
addressed many of the issues and questions raised. No conclusions were reached
or implied. Presentations were made at several professional meetings including
the ASCP-BOR, the ASCLS Board meeting, CLEC and the CLMA Board meeting. In all
cases it was emphasized that this was a feasibility study, and no action was
planned. Comments received were forwarded to the Task Force for consideration
and they were numerous during that year. Assurances were continually provided
that no action was planned other than to study the questions posed.
In April 2003 the Task Force submitted another report to the NAACLS Board along
with copies of the study documents. Included in the documents was a possible
task list for the CLS/MT practitioner of the future. Again the Board thanked the
Task Force, suggested further issues that should be raised, and approved
dissemination of the documents already developed. It was agreed that broad input
should continue to be invited.
At the beginning of the initiative, it was sincerely hoped by all involved that
the Task Force's activities and outcomes would stimulate informed dialogue. To
further facilitate that dialogue, the Task Force outcomes will be presented at
the CLMA/ASCP meeting in June and to an open forum of the ASCLS House of
Delegates in July. The NAACLS Board is pleased that there is active discussion
taking place within professional organizations about the future practitioner
level, for the future of the profession is clearly at stake.
National Academy Press. Crossing the Quality Chasm; A New Health
System for the 21st Century. March 2001.
American Hospital Association (Commission of Workforce for Hospitals and Health
Systems). In Our Hands; How Hospital Leaders Can Build a Thriving Workforce.
April 2002.
National Academy Press. Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. April
2003.

|

|

|

|

|
|
|

|
|

|
|
CEO's Corner
by Olive M. Kimball, PhD, EdD NAACLS Chief Executive Officer
|
|

|
|
Credentialing, Accreditation, Certification, Licensure
Their Importance to the Practice of Clinical Laboratory Science by Dr. Kathy V. Waller President, NAACLS Board of Directors
|
|

|
|
New Policy for Inactive Programs
by Dan Tice Administrative Liaison
|
|

|
|
Programs to be Site Visited
Fall 2003/Winter 2004 Cycle
|

|
|
|

|
|

|
|
Annual Report From Programs is a NAACLS Requirement
|
|

|
|
Board of Directors Update
(From the April 10, 2003 Meeting)
|
|

|
|
Dr. NAACLS
Advice for Accredited and Approved Programs
|
|

|
|
Including a Research Component in the CLS/MT and DMS Curricula
by Karen Madsen Myers, MA, MT(ASCP)SC, CLS(NCA) Member, PARC Committee
|
|

|
|
Information Services Update
by Elizabeth Everson Information Services Coordinator
|
|

|
|
NAACLS Elections Held
by Olive M. Kimball, EdD, PhD Chief Executive Officer
|
|

|
|
NAACLS Meeting Dates
|
|

|
|
NAACLS to Conduct Workshop in Chicago
|
|

|
|
Newly Accredited NAACLS Programs
|
|
|

Copyright © 2008 National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences. All rights reserved.
Comments or suggestions to the site editor.
|