NAACLS News









News



SEARCH:

 

JUMP:

National Accrediting
Agency for Clinical
Laboratory Sciences
5600 N River Rd
Suite 720
Rosemont, IL 60018

773.714.8880
773.714.8886 (FAX)

info@naacls.org
http://www.naacls.org


NAACLS logo



Get Acrobat Reader





Archives









Volume 89 - Spring/Summer 2005



CEO's Corner
NAACLS Survey
by Olive M. Kimball, PhD, EdD
Chief Executive Officer

CEO's Corner
By Olive M. Kimball, PhD, EdD
Chief Executive Officer

This was the second year during which, by means of an electronic survey, NAACLS received the annual report from programs. This was independent of the survey usually sent by the American Medical Association, the results of which are used in the Health Profession Education Directory. Beginning in March of this year NAACLS program directors were notified that the survey was coming. After the survey went out email reminders were sent. These were followed by phone calls and later by a very few "letters of last resort."

Table 1 shows the actual numbers of programs by level for 2003 and 2004. (From the 2004 (last year) and 2005 (this year) surveys.)

Table 1
Program Numbers
Type 2003 2004
CA 2 2
CG 5 5
CLS/MT 235 232
CLT/MLT 205 203
DMS 2 3
HT 25 25
HTL 2 2
PATH A 6 6
PHLEB 56 54

It can be seen that the numbers of programs have just about stabilized for the two years. However this follows a dramatic shift in numbers of viable programs for CLS/MT relative to 1994 when there were 383. From our current records, the number of program closures this year for CLS/MT is 5 as opposed to 32 closures in 1995, 24 in 1996 and 1997 and 24 again in 1999. While there has been a dramatic decline in program numbers, there is now a tapering off of withdrawals. For CLT/MLT programs the number of closures has also tapered off, for in 2005 there were three that closed in contrast to the peak in 2003 when 19 closed. Meanwhile, there continue to be a few new programs starting up.

Looking at numbers of graduates we can see from Table 2 that CLS/MT graduates increased in 2003 and 2004. However, they are still way below the numbers over the last decade, for in 1995 there were 3,572 graduates. The peak number of CLS/MT graduates occurred in the seventies when there were 6,519 graduates in 1977.

Despite the large number of program closures for CLT/MLT over the past ten years (there were 259 active programs in 1995) new programs continue to be accredited and the overall number of graduates is again increasing. It should be noted, however, that nearly 1000 graduates are from military programs and few of these graduates become certified and eventually go into non-military laboratories. Therefore, the actual number of possible new hires for civilian clinical laboratories is considerably less than 2000. Interestingly, last year programs were asked for an estimate of the number of graduates they would have this year. In most cases the numbers that actually graduated in 2004 were higher than estimates.

Table 2
Graduate Numbers
Type 2001 2002 2003 2004
CA 4 3 5 16
CG 30 35 38 36
CLS/MT 1894 1823 1923 1975
CLT/MLT 1817 1964 2143 2415
DMS 0 6 15 17
HT 111 164 193 200
HTL 9 8 5 16
PATH A 35 46 44 55



The number of histotechnician programs remains somewhat steady with very few initials or closures. However, the number of graduates appears to be higher than ever recorded with the average number of graduates per program now at seven or eight. That indicates an upswing in interest and this was confirmed by one or two histotechnician program directors on the survey who commented on an increase in class size. The average number of graduates seems to be increasing for CLS/MT as well and even more strikingly for phlebotomy. Several comments from CLS/MT program directors indicated increased enrollment but for some the quality of applicants is still an issue.

Attrition for programs varies considerably and there was apparently some confusion on the part of responders to the survey. Some provided attrition numbers over the entire program length and some by academic year. However, pathologists' assistant and histotechnologist programs had less than one percent of attrition for their programs but the overall attrition for a number of programs increased over the past year. CLT/MLT attrition seems to continue to be high (nearly 37 percent last year) and it was underscored by survey comments that were included such as:

  • Fewer applicants
  • Decline in academic ability
  • Students have too many other responsibilities while enrolled
A question on the survey asked about how difficult it was last year to find program faculty. While several program directors noted they find it difficult to recruit faculty with appropriate credentials for programs in a research university, very few responded that they were actually searching. Comments like "Have not had a reason to fill a position" or "I am the only full time faculty member" were typical.

On another note related to faculty, there were several comments suggesting that NAACLS should require specific educational and experiential requirements for faculty to assure that administrators don't fill faculty positions inappropriately. Still a few thought NAACLS was too prescriptive and/or should make the accreditation or approval process less cumbersome.

Another question asked what percentage of graduates found jobs within six months and/or went on to school. Only pathologists' assistant graduates all found jobs within the specified time and none went directly on to additional education. For DMS graduates, 92 percent found jobs within six months and eight percent went on to school. Figures for CLS/MT, CLT/MLT, Cyto, HT and HTL graduates were between 70-80 percent with many going on for additional education. Phlebotomy and clinical assistant graduates overall seemed to take the longest to find jobs but follow-up data of these graduates may not have been as complete or they may have been employed while in the educational program.

There seemed to be fewer technical challenges for program directors completing the survey this year and staff were willing and able to assist with any apparent problems. Respondents with older versions of Netscape reported problems getting past page four. We are working to resolve this but also encourage program directors to keep up to date with the free downloads of their web browsing software.

We were pleased to receive many comments about the survey itself. A few examples include:

Some critical but helpful:
Accreditation standards should be more stringent
Need separate survey designed for articulated programs
Survey concentrates too much on process
Survey appears geared towards 3+1 programs
Should be a 'don't know' in some categories (i.e. jobs, continuing ed.)


Some complementary:
The survey was short and easy to complete.
Thanks for making this so easy to fill out.
Nice survey! I found the survey to be user friendly; questions were easy to understand.
I have found that the surveys are conducted in fair and professional manner.


We appreciate the helpful comments and invite additional thoughts as we plan for the survey in spring of 2006. (Note: The Dr. NAACLS article in this issue of the NAACLS News discusses how the survey data is used.)








A Coalition is Pushing for Phlebotomy Personnel Standards
by Dennis Ernst, MT (ASCP)
Director, Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc.

CEO's Corner
NAACLS Survey
by Olive M. Kimball, PhD, EdD
Chief Executive Officer

NAACLS is Studying Advanced Level CLS/MT
Lucy J. Randles, M.A., CLS/CLDDir

President's Report
by David D. Gale, PhD
President, NAACLS Board of Directors



Combining Self Studies
by Marcia A. Armstrong, PhD, MT(ASCP), CLS(NCA)
Chair, Programs Approval Review Committee



Dr. NAACLS
Advice for Accredited and Approved Programs






Select an Issue     


Top

Copyright © 2008 National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences. All rights reserved.
Comments or suggestions to the site editor.





NAACLS.org Programs Students Volunteers Committees Help Accreditation Approval News About Us Search Links Home