Volume 92 - Special Edition	Download

Planning for the March 1, 2006 Stakeholder Meeting

Planning the Process

Final plans for the stakeholders meeting were completed in a January 2006 face to face meeting of the Task Force. It was determined that the stakeholder meeting should actively involve participants in discussion of key elements of a clinical doctorate.
The focus would be on the summary document prepared by the Graduate Task Force:
Clinical Doctorate in Clinical Laboratory Science: Practice Expertise and Requisite Education Summary Document. Participants would engage in discussion about several related issues.

The meeting venue was scheduled for the Crown Plaza Riverwalk Hotel in San Antonio. The date set was one day prior to the Clinical Laboratory Educators Conference (CLEC) held at the same hotel. The meeting was to convene at 8:30am and adjourn at 4:30pm.

To effectively initiate conversation, the introductory session would focus on specific hallmarks of the clinical doctorate as well as the more traditional PhD. Both the education and the practice components of each would be clearly identified.

Inviting the Stakeholders

It was believed that a broad spectrum of professionals and other stakeholders should be invited but also program directors of active graduate level CLS/MT programs should attend to provide perspectives on graduate program issues. A total of 28 separate professional organizations/agencies were sent a letter of invitation to the meeting with explanatory information. Eighteen responded affirmatively to the invitation. Several sent regrets but indicated an interest in being kept informed. All 30 program directors of graduate level CLS/MT programs were invited with 19 affirmative responses. Again several were unable to attend but asked to be kept informed.

One month prior to the meeting a follow-up letter was sent to participants with meeting site information and a general overview of meeting plans. Included with the letter were the following:

• March 1, 2006 Meeting Schedule
  
• Questions Asked and Answered
  
• Draft Summary Document
  
• Annotated Bibliography
  

Top of the News
			A Clinical Doctorate for the Laboratory
			Process and Outcomes of the NAACLS Graduate Task Force
			The Concept of the Clinical Doctorate in Clinical Laboratory Science: Role, Responsibilities and Education
Features
			A Pathologist's Perspective The Doctorate in Clinical Laboratory Sciences: The Time Has Come by Larry H. Bernstein, MD
			A Pathologist's Perspective The Clinical Doctorate: A Boon to Pathologists by Linda B. Piller, MD, MPH
			Evaluation of Participant Reactions to Stakeholder Meeting
Other News
			Background to Development of the Clinical Doctorate Initiative
			FAQs
			Next Steps in Development of Standards
			Planning for the March 1, 2006 Stakeholder Meeting
			Process Employed at the March 1, 2006 Stakeholder Meeting

	Select an Issue   Vol 109 - Fall 2011 Vol 108 - Summer 2011 Vol 107 - Spring 2011 Vol 106 - Volume 106 - Fall NAACLS News Vol 105 - Summer 2010 Vol 104 - Spring 2010 NAACLS News Vol 103 - Fall 2009 NAACLS News Vol 102 - Summer 2009 Vol 101 - Spring 2009 Vol 100 - Winter 2008 Vol 99 - Summer 2008 Vol 98 - Spring 2008 Vol 97 - Winter 2007 Vol 96 - Summer 2007 Vol 95 - Spring 2007 Vol 94 - Winter 2006 Vol 93 - Spring/Summer 2006 Vol 92 - Special Edition Vol 91 - Winter 2005 Vol 90 - Fall 2005 Vol 89 - Spring/Summer 2005 Vol 87 - Fall 2004 Vol 86 - Spring/Summer 2004 Vol 85 - Fall 2003 Vol 84 - Spring/Summer 2003 Vol 83 - Winter 2003 Vol 82 - Fall 2002 Vol 81 - Spring / Summer 2002 Vol 80 - Winter 2002 Vol 79 - Fall 2001 Vol 78 - Spring / Summer 2001 Vol 77 - Winter 2001 Vol 76 - Fall 2000 Vol 75 - Spring / Summer 2000 Vol 74 - Winter 2000 Vol 73 - Fall 1999 Vol 72 - Spring / Summer 1999 Vol 71 - Winter 1999 Vol 70 - Fall 1998 Vol 69 - Spring / Summer 1998 Vol 68 - Winter 1998 Vol 67 - Fall 1997 Vol 66 - Spring 1997 Vol 65 - Winter 1996 Vol 64 - Summer 1996 Vol 63 - Spring 1996 Vol 62 - Winter 1996 Vol 61 - Summer 1995 Vol 60 - Spring 1995 Vol 59 - Fall 1994 Vol 58 - Summer 1994 Vol 57 - Spring 1994 Vol 56 - Fall 1993 Vol 55 - Summer 1993 Vol 54 - Spring 1993 Vol 53 - Fall 1992 Vol 52 - Summer 1992 Vol 51 - Spring 1992 Vol 50 - Fall 1991 Vol 49 - Summer 1991 Vol 48 - Spring 1991 Vol 47 - Fall 1990 Vol 46 - Summer 1990 Vol 45 - Spring 1990 Vol 44 - Fall 1989 Vol 43 - Summer 1989 Vol 42 - Winter 1989 Vol 41 - Fall 1988 Vol 40 - April 1988 Vol 39 - December 1987 Vol 38 - September 1987 Vol 37 - Spring 1987 Vol 36 - Winter 1987 Vol 35 - October 1986 Vol 34 - November 1985 Vol 33 - November 1984 Vol 32 - July 1984 Vol 31 - November 1983 Vol 30 - November 1982 Vol 29 - November 1981 Vol 28 - December 1980 Vol 27 - August 1980 Vol 26 - September 1979 Vol 25 - August 1979 Vol 24 - June 1979 Vol 23 - February 1979 Vol 22 - October 1978 Vol 21 - July 1978 Vol 20 - April 1978 Vol 19 - October 1977 Vol 18 - July 1977 Vol 17 - April 1977 Vol 16 - February 1977 Vol 15 - November 1976 Vol 14 - September 1976 Vol 13 - June 1976 Vol 12 - December 1975 Vol 11 - October 1975 Vol 10 - August 1975 Vol 9 - July 1975 Vol 8 - June 1975 Vol 7 - April 1975 Vol 6 - February 1975 Vol 5 - December 1974 Vol 4 - November 1974 Vol 3 - September 1974 Vol 2 - August 1974 Vol 1 - June 1974